The
U.S. which has imposed misfortune and pain upon the Korean people for the last
several decades should roll back its anachronistic hostile policy toward the
DPRK which ranked itself among the advanced nuclear powers, facing up to the
latter's strategic position and the trend of the times. The Policy Department
of the National Defence Commission (NDC) of the DPRK demanded this in a
statement issued on Wednesday. The above-said principled stand of the DPRK
represents the thunder of justice heralding the final ruin of the U.S. and the
final warning by Songun Korea, it noted, and went on: The U.S. is not aware of
its impending miserable end, still seized with an anachronistic Cold War-minded
way of thinking. Odd views that in any case it is impossible to change the
principle of "north Korea's denuclearization first and halt to the pressure
on it next" are heard from the U.S. political camp including the White
House to mislead the public opinion. And a litany of such provocative
invectives that "a switchover in the U.S. government's policy towards
north Korea entirely hinges on its changes" is reeled off. The warmongers
of the Pentagon are openly talking about their plan to stage the
U.S.-Japansouth Korea joint drills under the simulated conditions of an actual
war for coping with the "threat" from the DPRK's ballistic missiles for
the first time in history as part of the scheduled large-scale RIMPAC
exercises. The cunning U.S. is taking such double-dealing attitude as hurling
the U.S. imperialist aggressor troops present in south Korea under the mask of
"UN force" into the Military Demarcation Line in Panmunjom for the
farce of "informing" over loudspeaker the KPA side of its wish to
restore the severed DPRK-U.S. military hotline and resume contact, afraid of
punishment in case it turns down the DPRK's principled demand. The statement
clarified once again that the hostile policy persistently pursued by the U.S.
towards the DPRK is a product of its anachronistic and unreasonable one lacking
understanding and self-ruinous policy. [1] The first reason is that the
above-said policy is a product of the anachronistic dream as it is insisting on
its unilateral brigandish demand, disregarding the changed reality and the
trend of the times. Early in the 1950s, the U.S. invaded the north, brandishing
A-bomb against rifle but it is standing against the irresistible entity
possessed of even tremendous H-bomb called "absolute weapon" on our
planet at present. Tragedy is that the U.S. is ignoring not only the changed
reality but the trend of the times. The longer the U.S. is carried away by the
hallucination of aggression and war, disregarding the worldwide trend, and the
more reckless moves it pursues to isolate and stifle the DPRK, the bitterer
disgrace it will suffer and the dearer price it will have to pay. The second
reason is that the U.S. hostile policy toward the DPRK is a product of
ignorance based on the theory of the jungle law bereft of any elementary
understanding of its rival. The DPRK-U.S. confrontation has lasted for 71 years
amid an extreme hostility. But the U.S. hostile policy toward the DPRK remains
unchanged as it has been consistently pursued by the most hostile and
outrageous methods. The U.S would be well advised to realize that it is the
best way of escaping the nightmare and misfortune to properly understand who
its rival is, though belatedly, recognize the reality, though painful, and
reshape its foolish Korea policy. The third reason is that the U.S. hostile
policy toward the DPRK is a product of a self-ruinous policy as it only
precipitates its most miserable final doom by itself. The history of the
DPRK-U.S. confrontation clearly records the immutable law that certain victory
is the tradition of Songun Korea and the brigandish U.S. is fated to sustain a
defeat. The U.S. should foresee what the DPRK-U.S. relations will be in future
in case it insists on its hostile policy toward the DPRK in the light of the
past and present realities. For the U.S. to roll back its anachronistic hostile
policy toward the DPRK as early as possible, though belatedly, would only offer
it an opportunity of escaping a miserable fate.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment