Given the prevailing situation, improved
relations between the Democratic People’s Republic
of Korea and the United States are
a long way off. All the blame falls upon the US that has made much ado about
improved relations and peace on the one hand but, on the other hand, is
resorting to all conceivable schemes in trying to prolong the economic
sanctions. This means there is no change in its policy of disarming the DPRK
first to create conditions for realizing its ambition of overthrowing the
latter’s social system.
In his April 12 policy speech at
the First Session of the 14th Supreme People’s Assembly of the DPRK,
Chairman Kim Jong Un
of the State Affairs Commission said: The more pronounced the US policy hostile
towards the DPRK becomes, the tougher our counteraction will become; if the US
wants the settlement of issues through dialogue, it should have the right
attitude and find a methodology that can be shared with us.
Last year, the DPRK voluntarily
took crucial and significant measures including the discontinuation of nuclear
test and test-fire of intercontinental ballistic missile, thereby taking the
first step towards confidence-building which is the main key to the removal of
bilateral hostile relations. It also demolished completely the nuclear test
site in its northern part.
Chairman Kim
Jong Un, together
with US President Trump, signed the June 12 DPRK-US Joint Statement, a historic
declaration announcing to the world that the two countries would write a new
history of relationship. During the summit talks he also took steps for
realizing the repatriation of the remains of US soldiers, which had been
requested by the US
President. On several occasions after the meeting, he reaffirmed his will to
sincerely implement the joint statement. At the second DPRK-US summit talks and
meeting he expressed his resolve to set the essential stages and course to be
followed without fail for the implementation of the joint statement in the
interests of both sides and to take more prudent and trustworthy steps.
However, the US ’ response
was disappointing.
Some American politicians judged
that the DPRK came to the negotiating table because sanctions were imposed on
it; they are throwing the wet blanket over the atmosphere for dialogue by clamouring
about “maximum pressure.” Most recently the US conducted a test for simulated
interception of the DPRK’s intercontinental ballistic missile and resumed
military exercises, which the US President had committed himself to suspending,
by changing their names. During the Hanoi
summit talks it presented its arbitrary demands which were unacceptable to the
dialogue partner.
What the DPRK wants is to
establish, through confidence-building, a durable peace mechanism on the Korean
peninsula where a volatile situation prevailed, rather than having the
sanctions lifted.
If the US , ignorant of what its dialogue
partner thinks, insists on forcing its outrageous demands on the latter, it is
nothing more than a foolish dream.
The DPRK will make no concession
or compromise over the issues concerning the fundamental interests of its State
and people. So it attaches importance to the settlement of issues through
dialogue and negotiations, but it is not interested in the US-style dialogue of
unilaterally pushing its demands.
Kim
Jong Un said: What
is obvious is that if the US sticks to its current political way of
calculation, the prospects for problem solving will be bleak and very
dangerous; at this crucial time, I hope that the United States will make a
well-advised judgment and the second hand of the clock of the DPRK-US showdown
which they stopped with so much difficulty will not move again for all ages.
Now the US should
realize that, by its sort of thinking, it will not be able to move the DPRK one
iota nor get what it wants at all, even if it sits with the latter a hundred
times, a thousand times.
No comments:
Post a Comment