Pyongyang,
April 7 (KCNA) -- An international affairs analyst, Ri Jong Su, on Friday
released the following article entitled "AUKUS crumbles international
Nuclear Non-Proliferation system and sparks off arms race":
Recently
the U.S. made public that it decided to sell 220 Tomahawk cruise missiles worth
895 million US$ to be mounted on destroyers and future Virginia-class attack
nuclear-powered submarines of Australia. Britain also made it known that 3
billion pounds out of 5 billion pounds of defence spending to be additionally
expended for the coming two years will be allocated to AUKUS.
On
March 13, the U.S. president and British and Australian prime ministers
released a joint statement at the San Diego naval base in California of the
U.S., the home port for the U.S. Pacific Fleet, to the effect that Australia
will establish 8-nuclear-powered sub team with the investment of 245 billion
US$, under cooperation with the U.S. and Britain, by 2055.
The
nature of AUKUS is becoming clear as a product of "new Cold War".
Wrecker of International Nuclear Non-Proliferation System
According
to the AUKUS nuclear submarine cooperation plan made public by the three
leaders, the U.S. and British nuclear submarines will start regular entry into
Australian port from 2023 and 2026 and they will be put under rotational
deployment from 2027. From the early 2030s the U.S. will reportedly build three
Virginia-class nuclear submarines to sell to Australia and when necessary
additionally sell two more. It is also said that particularly it will
officially hand over new SSN-AUKUS nuclear submarines jointly built with the
introduction of ultra-modern technology of the three countries based on the
British design, to Britain by the end of the 2030s and to Australia by the
beginning of the 2040s.
The
transfer of weapon-grade highly enriched uranium to non-nuclear state Australia
by the U.S. and Britain, nuclear weapons states and signatories to the Nuclear
Non-Proliferation Treaty, becomes apparent nuclear proliferation act. This is
unanimous comment of the unbiased international community.
However,
the U.S., Britain and Australia insist that the contested submarines are not
loaded with nuclear warhead missiles and, therefore, do not contravene the
international nuclear non-proliferation system.
Lurking
behind this is the U.S. arrogance that the world's only superpower can do
whatever it is determined, and the blind belief of the vassal states.
The
arrogance and over-confidence of the U.S. as the world's first user of nuclear
weapons and the world's biggest nuclear weapons state have reached the state of
issuing a free pass to the nuclear club for those countries "close to it
in terms of race and kindred" and which follow it. This leads to a big
hole in the international nuclear non-proliferation system.
If
this state is allowed, it is not hard to predict that either the U.S. hands
over to Australia a nuclear missile-loaded submarine or there can happen
anytime such "big thing" of Australia misusing highly enriched
uranium whose original purpose is to be used for nuclear submarine.
Making
public this plan, the U.S. president remarked "This first project is only
beginning", which meant the expansion of AUKUS with other allies besides
Britain and Australia in mind.
There
is ample possibility for the AUKUS to be expanded to "other like-minded
states" of the U.S. such as Japan and Canada which are so much envious of
Australia's "windfall". In this case the international nuclear
non-proliferation system will remain just in name only.
The
situation shows that the U.S. oft-repeated international nuclear non- proliferation
system is a tool for strengthening the exclusive nuclear weaponization of the
U.S. and its allies.
Seed
of New Arms Race
The
end of the Cold War that came along with the disbandment of the former Soviet
Union brought new trouble to the U.S.
China,
Russia, South Africa, Brazil and other newly developing big powers emerged fast
and the multi-polarization has become a world trend that cannot be ignored.
This urged the U.S. to look for ways of maintaining its hegemonic position in
increasing military expenditure and triggering off new Cold War.
The
recent transaction for arming Australia with nuclear-powered submarines will
reportedly cost a total of 245 billion US$, which will naturally stoke arms
race worldwide, to say nothing of Asia-Pacific.
No
country in the Asia-Pacific region eyes Australia situated in the middle of the
ocean far away from it.
It
is up to the Australian prime minister to explain taxpayers of his country
about the squandering of fund running at an astronomical figure for the unnecessary
purchase of the nuclear-powered submarines. But giving an understandable answer
to Asia-Pacific countries about the reason behind the escalation of tension,
creation of instability and triggering of arms race is unavoidable
responsibility of the heads of the AUKUS states.
The
situation proves that increased military expenditure by the U.S. and its allies
has been the cause of regional or worldwide arms races in the last century and
the present century.
The
U.S. commenced Freedom Shield joint military drill simulating an all-out war
against the DPRK from March 13 and staged the largest-ever Ssangryong combined
landing drill with the involvement of nuclear carrier Nimitz strike group from
March 20 to April 3, after five-year hiatus. It, at the same time, puts extreme
military pressure on the DPRK, pushing the situation on the Korean Peninsula to
the threshold of a nuclear war.
What
can not be overlooked is the criticism against the DPRK made at confabs of the
AUKUS heads held across the Pacific, timed to coincide with those exercises.
The
British prime minister said "Russia's illegal invasion of Ukraine, China's
growing assertiveness, the destabilising behaviour of Iran and North Korea all
threaten to create a world defined by danger, disorder, and division," in
a bid to justify the "necessity" of AUKUS. Noting that the AUKUS will
contribute to the regional peace and stability, a high-ranking official of the
U.S. State Department said that "We've seen a growth in challenges across
the region posed by a host of countries, from the PRC to Russia to North Korea
and elsewhere. And again, these challenges are not limited just to the
Indo-Pacific, but beyond."
This
indicates that AUKUS submarines can emerge in any places essential for
maintaining the U.S. hegemonic position whether it is the South Sea of China or
the waters off the Korean Peninsula.
Britain
sent more than 40 Royal marines to Ssangryong combined landing drill targeting
"occupation of Pyongyang" and Australia took part as an observer.
This proves that AUKUS can be misused for the U.S. new aggression war attempt
on the Korean Peninsula.
The
security environment in the Asia-Pacific region daily exacerbating due to the
U.S.
and its vassal forces proves that the bolstered nuclear war deterrence of the
DPRK
is a fundamental guarantee for maintaining regional peace and stability and the
balance of power
No comments:
Post a Comment