Pyongyang,
April 5 (KCNA) -- Kim Yo Jong, vice department director of the Central
Committee of the Workers' Party of Korea (WPK), released the following press
statement on April 4:
So
Uk, defense minister of south Korea, on April 1 revealed extreme uneasiness,
touting a "preemptive strike" on our army's possible strike means
against south Korea.
His
abrupt bluffing evidently showed that they are so frightened.
It
seems that he wanted to give impression to the public that the south Korean
army is well prepared.
But
it was an irretrievable very big mistake that he, so-called representative of
the south Korean army, talked about "preemptive strike", terming us
enemy.
We
have already clarified that south Korea is not our principal enemy.
In
other words, it means that unless the south Korean army takes any military
action against our state, it will not be regarded as a target of our attack.
We
oppose war. If the armies of the two sides fight against each other, the entire
Korean nation will suffer a disaster as it did half a century ago that might be
more terrible, no matter which side will win or lose in a war or combat.
We
are definitely against such war. That's why our Marshal clarified that our
principal enemy is just war itself.
However,
the south Korean army, labeling us as enemy, talked about the possibility of
mounting a preemptive strike on us with such a premise as in certain
circumstances. Such nonsense itself is a very dangerous and nasty expression.
If
anyone does not provoke us, we will never strike it before anything else.
But
if south Korea, for any reason - whether or not it is blinded by misjudgment -
opts for such military action as "preemptive strike" touted by So Uk,
the situation will change.
In
that case, south Korea itself will become a target.
Two
days ago, we solemnly warned that the south Korean army will face an
unimaginably terrible disaster, the worst-ever, if it violates even an inch of
our territory.
In
case south Korea opts for military confrontation with us, our nuclear combat
force will have to inevitably carry out its duty.
It
is the primary mission of the nuclear force to prevent such war before anything
else, but in case of war, its mission will convert into the one of eliminating
the enemy's armed forces at a strike.
One's
nuclear combat force is mobilized to take initiative at the outset of war,
completely dampen the enemy's war spirits, prevent protracted hostilities and
preserve one's own military muscle.
If
the situation reaches such phase, a dreadful attack will be launched and the
south Korean army will have to face a miserable fate little short of total
destruction and ruin.
This
is not just a threat.
This
is a detailed explanation of our reaction to possible reckless military action
by south Korea and its consequences and, at the same time, a briefing on the
reason why south Korea should not harbor such fancy as military provocation
against a nuclear weapons state.
But
there is a way for averting such miserable end.
It
will be possible to avoid the above-said horrible disaster, if it refrains from
making untimely provocation and dreaming a daydream and ponders over a way for
protecting itself from a shower of fire, although it might not happen.
"Preemptive
strike" against a nuclear weapons state? … This is a fantastic daydream,
and it is hysteria of a lunatic. We make it clear once again.
We
will not fire even a single bullet or shell toward south Korea. It is because
we do not regard it as match for our armed forces.
This
opinion comes not from an obvious contrast with a nuclear weapons state in the
light of military capabilities but from the fact that the north and the south
of Korea are of the same nation who should not fight against each other.
I
pray that such morbid symptom as feeling threat for no ground would be cured as
early as possible.
No comments:
Post a Comment